West Midlands councils give Pickles’ planning proposals a lukewarm response

Plans to ease the conversion of empty office blocks into new homes have received a “lukewarm” reception from local authorities across the West Midlands.

According to a survey by CBRE, just six out of the 13 councils covering the region have given the thumbs up to Government proposals to introduce new “permitted development rights”, designed to allow developers to by-pass the planning system.

Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) chief Eric Pickles announced the new permitted development rights in January. The move is designed to tackle the national housing shortage, as well as bringing redundant office stock back into use. Local authorities were given until 22 February to make applications for exemptions.

Following the consultation exercise, Coventry, Wolverhampton, North Warwickshire, Bromsgrove, Stratford and Solihull have all embraced the proposals.

Wolverhampton is out of step with neighbouring Black Country authorities Dudley, Sandwell and Walsall, who are seeking total exemption from the rules.

Birmingham, Redditch, Warwick and Cherwell are all staging a ‘partial’ revolt, requesting exemption for parts of their respective patches.

Many developers had welcomed the relaxation of the planning rules. Among the attractions of office conversions is the potential reduction in development costs – it is typically £60 to £75 per sq ft for a conversion, compared to £90 up to £125 plus for new build.

Adrian Willet, a director in the development team at the Birmingham office of CBRE, said developers keen to exploit the booming private rental market will be disappointed by the scattergun approach across the region.

“The proposed planning relaxation is significant in that it negates the need for Section 106 obligations, and offers a fast-track solution to housing delivery. With no need to make additional financial contributions or include affordable housing, schemes which didn’t previously stack up financially become viable,” he added.

Mr Willet has already seen one scheme he has been advising on fall by the wayside as a result of that local authority’s request for exemption.

He said: “My fear for many of these sites is that they will continue to be blighted as a result of local authorities prevaricating. Their owners will be stuck with redundant stock and saddled with paying business rates on empty space.

“There are already many constraints on office-to-resi conversions. These include division of internal floorspace, parking, location and technical issues, all or any of which can rule out conversion. Price is also a factor – office landlords generally expect significantly higher values than residential developers are prepared to pay, although there is a reality on value emerging among the more enlightened landlords.

“In addition to these market checks on conversions, buildings which require any material external changes will continue to need planning permission. With these safeguards already in place, it’s a pity that some local authorities couldn’t have been more welcoming of the proposals, especially as we have seen renewed interest in redundant office buildings as a result of this well intentioned initiative.”

In Birmingham, the city council has applied for exemption in the Central Business District, the new Enterprise Zone, most of the Jewellery Quarter, areas in Bournville, the Tyseley Enterprise Zone and Longbridge Technology Park.

Eleanor Deeley, associate director in the development team, said: “Birmingham has identified parts of the city they want to protect, leaving others where the permitted development rights can apply. Whilst there may not be total agreement on the areas they have applied the exemption to, at least there is scope for delivery of some empty, redundant office buildings in areas such as Edgbaston, Sutton Coldfield and locations on the fringe of the central business district.

“I’m particularly surprised by the protectionist stance taken by the Black Country authorities of Dudley, Sandwell and Walsall. Arguably, they should embrace the provisions as they could bring much needed vitality back into their town centres.

“The more enlightened authorities seem to be the shire authorities, including Bromsgrove, Solihull and Warwick, along with metropolitan authorities Coventry and Wolverhampton, who have either accepted total relaxation or only sought partial exemption.”

CBRE has also surveyed the 33 councils in London. By and large the proposals received a huge thumbs down, with just three of the capital’s boroughs giving the plans their full backing.

LOCAL AUTHORITY

RESPONSE TO PROPOSALS*

Birmingham

Partial exemption requested (CBD; new EZ sites; parts of Jewellery Quarter; parts of Bournville; Tyseley Enterprise Zone; Longbridge Tech Park

Bromsgrove

Acceptance

Cherwell

Exemption for Banbury and Bicester town centre

Coventry

Acceptance

Dudley

Total exemption

North Warwickshire

Acceptance

Redditch

Partial exemption, on everything but town centre

Sandwell

Total exemption

Solihull

Acceptance

Stratford

Acceptance

Walsall

Total exemption

Warwick

Exemption sought for Stoneleigh Park, Warwick Technology Park, Leamington town centre

Wolverhampton

Acceptance

* Local authorities surveyed by CBRE